Skip to main content
How To Choose

Start with the pressure, not the service name.

If the problem is unclear, start with a diagnostic. If the decision is vendor-related, start with Gatekeeper. If the program is already exposed, start with AIGRaaS.

Unclear risk

Use a diagnostic when the facts are scattered.

Best when leadership needs a risk map, decision log, evidence pack, and 90-day path before approving the next move.

Vendor pressure

Use Gatekeeper before the signature.

Best when a vendor packet, SOW, architecture, privacy posture, or funding request needs an independent readiness call.

Program exposure

Use AIGRaaS when the program is already in flight.

Best when a funded AI initiative needs owners, gates, remediation, evidence, and executive-ready accountability.

What Changes

The output is evidence leaders can act on.

The engagement stays practical. We name the decision, expose missing evidence, assign owners, define the gate, and leave the team with artifacts they can use in the next executive, audit, vendor, or delivery conversation.

Decision
Approve, condition, hold, or remediate.
Evidence
Show what supports the decision.
Ownership
Name who owns every material gap.
Cadence
Define when the next gate happens.
How It Starts

Bring the file that needs an answer.

The vendor bid, stalled rollout, incident record, policy library, or board question becomes the starting point. The first conversation turns pressure into a scoped path and a concrete next gate.

1
Expose

Map the decision.

Risk surface, owners, and missing evidence become visible.

2
Remediate

Build the gate.

Controls, dashboards, rituals, and training wrap the work.

3
Transfer

Leave artifacts.

Board brief, playbook, release criteria, and cadence move with the team.